RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Economic’

Which describes the impact of the develpmt of core-dependnt economic zones on state formation MULTIPLE CHOICE?

31 Aug

Which of the following statements most accurately describes the impact of the development of core-dependent economic zones on state formation?

A) Forced labor and European influence tended to generate weak governments in dependent regions, while increased trade revenues tended to generate increasing government strength in core states.
B) While the profits of global trade tended to strengthen the governments of core regions, the creation of colonies extended powerful governments to dependent zones as well.
C) Dependent regions and their governments grew stronger in response to the European threat.
D) The efforts of international trade tended to enrich private commercial interests but weaken core governments who were unable to tap the wealth. Dependent zone governments, based on company organization, tended to be strong.
E) No state government benfitted from the creation of core-dependent zones. Neither core regions nor colonies were able to develop strong, centralized governments.

THANK YOU!

 

If you are in student loan default with wage garnishment do you still get the economic stimulus checks?

20 Aug

I have some back taxes to go through and was just wondering if the govt. will take my stimulus package as payment of a defaulted student loan.

 

Is corporate malfeasance a major contributor to the coming recession & our other economic messes?

12 Jul

Other economic messes I mean problems like like abnormally high energy costs, the devalued US dollar vs other country currencies, unaffordable healthcare costs, and the loss of manufacturing jobs by outsourcing under a predatory low-cost labor policy. Other factors apply but how much would you atribute responsibility to our corporations! Oilco’s, Walmarts, banks, investment,trading and finance and brockerage companies in housing and the stock and bond market, to name but a few of them.
tiny example:http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUKN1947825920080319?rpc=44&sp=true
Pfo, I think your opinion is naive,dismissive and short-sighted. My Q is based on many years of personal investment and business experience and I am outraged by the unethical attitude , the “me- me attitude” of so many people inside corporations and those who frequent Yahoo Answers trying to disinform others. The feeling of living in a secure world has been lost by many of us! Except for the few filthy rich and powerful who are immune to the social and economic upheavals that have affect the way most of us –the baby boomers and our parents, who look at retirement with fear– have to live. There are no guarantees but in a civil society with all our resources, why are most of us living so defensively and fearing the future bec of the instability around us bec of the mentioned attitudes and the malfeasance reported daily in the press?http://www.creativeinvest.com/sri/corpmal.html
Obviously you aren’t a subprimer about to lose it all and you have no sensitivity or compassion for such people. I am not among them ;but I am neither blind nor am I sugarcoating my Q’s about who in authority are to blame for our economic messes!
Sidenote: Many European Banks behaved badly like Bear Stearns did following the Enron pattern. I see deep problems coming for the US bec they will blame the US for sucking them in on highly leveraged Collateralized Debt Obligations backed by the lax lending practices like the loans by US Banks to the subprimers! Argentina’s experience could be repeated in the US since lending to the US is likely to be curtailed. Our debts are out of wack with respect to our incomes, spending habits and savings patterns! Our cars are gas guzzlers and we will have to adjust our ways as the rest of the world becomes as economically developed and demanding as we are. That’s what globalization is about–equalization in labor and the returns on capital investments!
Another example: http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080320/lawsuit_kickbacks.html?printer=1

 

Why do Republican policies always create a total economic disaster?

06 Jul

Republicans controlled the entire govt from 1921-1933 and created a great depression.

Nixon ended the gold standard which created a total economic disaster and then he used government price and wage controls to control his massive inflation.

Reagan tripled our debt which is like obama overspending by 23 trillion in 8 years.

Here is what happened after 12 years of a republican congress and 6 years of an entire republican government:

Between Jan 2001-2009 under Republican’s policies of deregulation and a 15% tax rate on stock profits for wealthy people:

Budget went from a 236 billion surplus to a 1.2 TRILLION deficit (a 1.4 trillion drop)
National debt doubled from 5.7 trillion to 10.6 trillion (a 5.2 trillion increase)
Dow Jones plunged 25% from 10,587 to 7,949
Trillions in bad loans and gambling debts co-signed/guaranteed by the US Govt
Two fake wars costing a trillion dollars and 6,000 american lives
Gasoline tripled from 1.44 to 4.11 per gallon on July 11, 2008
Unemployment doubled from 4.2% to 8.2%
Losing 700,000 jobs monthly
Economy in total freefall

(Republicans try to confuse people by saying democrats took over Congress in Jan 2007 and started the recession, but they can’t name one thing democrats did to hurt the economy. All experts state the housing crisis started in 2006 and all subprime loans had already been made under a republican congress and president)
SOURCES:
BUSH OVERSAW A DOW JONES THAT PLUNGED 25% OVER 8 YEARS
(Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^DJI)

GASOLINE TRIPLED UNDER BUSH ENERGY POLICY
(Source: US Dept of Energy- Energy Information Administration) (http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MG_RT_US&f=W)

BUSH DOUBLED UNEMPLOYMENT FROM 4.2% TO 8.2% —–(Feb 2001-2009)
(Source: US Dept of Labor – Bureau of Labor Statistics-)
(http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&graph_name=LN_cpsbref3)

BUSH DOUBLED OUR DEBT FROM 5.7 TRILLION TO 10.6 TRILLION
(Source: US Treasury Dept – Bureau of Public Debt – http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np)

BUSH TURNED A 236 BILLION BUDGET SURPLUS INTO A 1.2 TRILLION DEFICIT (A 1.4 TRILLION DROP)
(Source 1: CBO – Congressional Budget Office – Historical Budget data – Shows the 236 billion surplus in 2000)
(http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10871/historicaltables.pdf)

(Source 2: Congressional Budget Office – Annual budget and economic report and testimony before Congress on Jan 8, 2009) (Both the report and testimony before congress declare a 1.2 trillion deficit for fiscal year 2009 —2 weeks before obama takes office)
(http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9958/01-08-Outlook_Testimony.pdf)

(Please note: The fiscal year 2009 started Oct 1, 2008 under president bush. At that time, the 2009 deficit was projected at 600 billion. Then the banking crisis occured in Oct 2008 and bush started a 700 billion TARP bailout program which was added to the 600 billion deficit which left obama with a 1.2 Trillion deficit the day he took office according to the CBO)

 
6 Comments

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Why do republicans always create a total economic disaster with corporate welfare and looting?

04 Jul

Between Jan 2001-2009 under Republican’s policies of deregulation and a 15% tax rate on stock profits for wealthy people:

Budget went from a 236 billion surplus to a 1.2 TRILLION deficit (a 1.4 trillion drop)
National debt doubled from 5.7 trillion to 10.6 trillion (a 5.2 trillion increase)
Dow Jones plunged 25% from 10,587 to 7949
Gasoline tripled from 1.44 to 4.11 per gallon on July 11, 2008
Unemployment doubled from 4.2% to 8.2%
Losing 700,000 jobs monthly
Economy in total freefall

(Republicans try to confuse people by saying democrats took over in Jan 2007 and started the recession, but they can not name one thing democrats did to hurt the economy. All experts state the housing crisis started in 2006 and all subprime loans had already been made under a republican congress and president)

SOURCES:
BUSH OVERSAW A DOW JONES THAT PLUNGED 25% OVER 8 YEARS
(Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^DJI)

GASOLINE TRIPLED UNDER BUSH ENERGY POLICY
(Source: US Dept of Energy- Energy Information Administration) (http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MG_RT_US&f=W)

BUSH DOUBLED UNEMPLOYMENT FROM 4.2% TO 8.2% —–(Feb 2001-2009)
(Source: US Dept of Labor – Bureau of Labor Statistics-)
(http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&graph_name=LN_cpsbref3)

BUSH DOUBLED OUR DEBT FROM 5.7 TRILLION TO 10.6 TRILLION
(Source: US Treasury Dept – Bureau of Public Debt – http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np)

BUSH TURNED A 236 BILLION BUDGET SURPLUS INTO A 1.2 TRILLION DEFICIT (A 1.4 TRILLION DROP)
(Source 1: CBO – Congressional Budget Office – Historical Budget data – Shows the 236 billion surplus in 2000)
(http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10871/historicaltables.pdf)

(Source 2: Congressional Budget Office – Annual budget and economic report and testimony before Congress on Jan 8, 2009) (Both the report and testimony before congress declare a 1.2 trillion deficit for fiscal year 2009 —2 weeks before obama takes office)
(http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9958/01-08-Outlook_Testimony.pdf)

(Please note: The fiscal year 2009 started Oct 1, 2008 under president bush. At that time, the 2009 deficit was projected at 600 billion. Then the banking crisis occured in Oct 2008 and bush started a 700 billion TARP bailout program which was added to the 600 billion deficit which left obama with a 1.2 Trillion deficit the day he took office according to the CBO)

 
4 Comments

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Why do republican policies always create a total economic disaster? Do you ever cry about it?

03 Jul

Republicans controlled the entire govt from 1921-1933 and created a great depression.

Nixon ended the gold standard which created a total economic disaster and then he used government price and wage controls to control his massive inflation.

Reagan tripled our debt which is like obama overspending by 23 trillion in 8 years.

Here is what happened after 12 years of a republican congress and 6 years of an entire republican government:

Between Jan 2001-2009 under Republican’s policies of deregulation and a 15% tax rate on stock profits for wealthy people:

Budget went from a 236 billion surplus to a 1.2 TRILLION deficit (a 1.4 trillion drop)
National debt doubled from 5.7 trillion to 10.6 trillion (a 5.2 trillion increase)
Dow Jones plunged 25% from 10,587 to 7,949
Trillions in bad loans and gambling debts co-signed/guaranteed by the US Govt
Two fake wars costing a trillion dollars and 6,000 american lives
Gasoline tripled from 1.44 to 4.11 per gallon on July 11, 2008
Unemployment doubled from 4.2% to 8.2%
Losing 700,000 jobs monthly
Economy in total freefall

(Republicans try to confuse people by saying democrats took over Congress in Jan 2007 and started the recession, but they can’t name one thing democrats did to hurt the economy. All experts state the housing crisis started in 2006 and all subprime loans had already been made under a republican congress and president)
SOURCES:
BUSH OVERSAW A DOW JONES THAT PLUNGED 25% OVER 8 YEARS
(Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^DJI)

GASOLINE TRIPLED UNDER BUSH ENERGY POLICY
(Source: US Dept of Energy- Energy Information Administration) (http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MG_RT_US&f=W)

BUSH DOUBLED UNEMPLOYMENT FROM 4.2% TO 8.2% —–(Feb 2001-2009)
(Source: US Dept of Labor – Bureau of Labor Statistics-)
(http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&graph_name=LN_cpsbref3)

BUSH DOUBLED OUR DEBT FROM 5.7 TRILLION TO 10.6 TRILLION
(Source: US Treasury Dept – Bureau of Public Debt – http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np)

BUSH TURNED A 236 BILLION BUDGET SURPLUS INTO A 1.2 TRILLION DEFICIT (A 1.4 TRILLION DROP)
(Source 1: CBO – Congressional Budget Office – Historical Budget data – Shows the 236 billion surplus in 2000)
(http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10871/historicaltables.pdf)

(Source 2: Congressional Budget Office – Annual budget and economic report and testimony before Congress on Jan 8, 2009) (Both the report and testimony before congress declare a 1.2 trillion deficit for fiscal year 2009 —2 weeks before obama takes office)
(http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9958/01-08-Outlook_Testimony.pdf)

(Please note: The fiscal year 2009 started Oct 1, 2008 under president bush. At that time, the 2009 deficit was projected at 600 billion. Then the banking crisis occured in Oct 2008 and bush started a 700 billion TARP bailout program which was added to the 600 billion deficit which left obama with a 1.2 Trillion deficit the day he took office according to the CBO)

 
9 Comments

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Why do republican polices always lead to a total economic disaster?

02 Jul

Here is what happened after 12 years of a republican congress and 6 years of an entire republican government:

Between Jan 2001-2009 under Republican’s policies of deregulation and a 15% tax rate on stock profits for wealthy people:

Budget went from a 236 billion surplus to a 1.2 TRILLION deficit (a 1.4 trillion drop)
National debt doubled from 5.7 trillion to 10.6 trillion (a 5.2 trillion increase)
Dow Jones plunged 25% from 10,587 to 7,949
Gasoline tripled from 1.44 to 4.11 per gallon on July 11, 2008
Unemployment doubled from 4.2% to 8.2%
Losing 700,000 jobs monthly
Economy in total freefall

(Republicans try to confuse people by saying democrats took over in Jan 2007 and started the recession, but they can not name one thing democrats did to hurt the economy. All experts state the housing crisis started in 2006 and all subprime loans had already been made under a republican congress and president)

SOURCES:
BUSH OVERSAW A DOW JONES THAT PLUNGED 25% OVER 8 YEARS
(Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^DJI)

GASOLINE TRIPLED UNDER BUSH ENERGY POLICY
(Source: US Dept of Energy- Energy Information Administration) (http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MG_RT_US&f=W)

BUSH DOUBLED UNEMPLOYMENT FROM 4.2% TO 8.2% —–(Feb 2001-2009)
(Source: US Dept of Labor – Bureau of Labor Statistics-)
(http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&graph_name=LN_cpsbref3)

BUSH DOUBLED OUR DEBT FROM 5.7 TRILLION TO 10.6 TRILLION
(Source: US Treasury Dept – Bureau of Public Debt – http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np)

BUSH TURNED A 236 BILLION BUDGET SURPLUS INTO A 1.2 TRILLION DEFICIT (A 1.4 TRILLION DROP)
(Source 1: CBO – Congressional Budget Office – Historical Budget data – Shows the 236 billion surplus in 2000)
(http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10871/historicaltables.pdf)

(Source 2: Congressional Budget Office – Annual budget and economic report and testimony before Congress on Jan 8, 2009) (Both the report and testimony before congress declare a 1.2 trillion deficit for fiscal year 2009 —2 weeks before obama takes office)
(http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9958/01-08-Outlook_Testimony.pdf)

 
19 Comments

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Why do republicans always create a total economic disaster?

26 Jun

Here is what happened after 12 years of a republican congress and 6 years of an entire republican government:

Between Jan 2001-2009 under Republican’s policies of deregulation and a 15% tax rate on stock profits for wealthy people:

Budget went from a 236 billion surplus to a 1.2 TRILLION deficit (a 1.4 trillion drop)
National debt doubled from 5.7 trillion to 10.6 trillion (a 5.2 trillion increase)
Dow Jones plunged 25% from 10,587 to 7,949
Gasoline tripled from 1.44 to 4.11 per gallon on July 11, 2008
Unemployment doubled from 4.2% to 8.2%
Losing 700,000 jobs monthly
Economy in total freefall

(Republicans try to confuse people by saying democrats took over in Jan 2007 and started the recession, but they can not name one thing democrats did to hurt the economy. All experts state the housing crisis started in 2006 and all subprime loans had already been made under a republican congress and president)

SOURCES:
BUSH OVERSAW A DOW JONES THAT PLUNGED 25% OVER 8 YEARS
(Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^DJI)

GASOLINE TRIPLED UNDER BUSH ENERGY POLICY
(Source: US Dept of Energy- Energy Information Administration) (http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MG_RT_US&f=W)

BUSH DOUBLED UNEMPLOYMENT FROM 4.2% TO 8.2% —–(Feb 2001-2009)
(Source: US Dept of Labor – Bureau of Labor Statistics-)
(http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&graph_name=LN_cpsbref3)

BUSH DOUBLED OUR DEBT FROM 5.7 TRILLION TO 10.6 TRILLION
(Source: US Treasury Dept – Bureau of Public Debt – http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np)

BUSH TURNED A 236 BILLION BUDGET SURPLUS INTO A 1.2 TRILLION DEFICIT (A 1.4 TRILLION DROP)
(Source 1: CBO – Congressional Budget Office – Historical Budget data – Shows the 236 billion surplus in 2000)
(http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10871/historicaltables.pdf)

(Source 2: Congressional Budget Office – Annual budget and economic report and testimony before Congress on Jan 8, 2009) (Both the report and testimony before congress declare a 1.2 trillion deficit for fiscal year 2009 —2 weeks before obama takes office)
(http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9958/01-08-Outlook_Testimony.pdf)

 
19 Comments

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Why do liberals point to GDP and DOW for economic growth?

25 Jun

The DOW increased during 1933-1941
The GDP increased from 1933-1941

Unemployment never fell below 14% until 1941…
Economic Productivity never went up until 1941…

Is this proof of liberal’s lack of knowledge in economics?

GDP http://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2008/08%20August/0808_gdp_nipas.pdf
Go to yahoo stocks and just view stock history – it goes all they way back to the crash

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=^DJI#chart2:symbol=^dji;range=my;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined

I hope they know our GDP can be raised by government spending…
lol Quan, you were saying this months back on yahoo! who can not remember that? That was you’re only argument back then – besides blaming bush

 
6 Comments

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Economic question.. US $ exchange rate..?

23 May

Hello,
I need some help to find any good article that talks about
Brazil VS US dollar for my economic class..

I just don’t know how to search, and always get the wrong article :(

 

With all the recent economic turmoil, why is the American Dollar so strong?

07 May

I’m an American living abroad in Australia. I’ve recently been expecting to see a leveling of the exchange rate between the AUD and the USD following the “crisis” in the American markets. But it the past week, the AUD has gone from $.85 to $.72 against the USD. How is this possible?

 
10 Comments

Posted in Uncategorized

 

EConomic Development, Foreign Investment and the Law

01 May

Product Description
This new publication was inspired by the desire to commemorate the 25th Anniversary of the founding of the Section on Business Law of the International Bar Association. Practising lawyers from all over the world have contributed to this book with their knowledge and expertise. The issues involved in the economic development process have been pursued with a practical approach. Bearing in mind that the legal system of each country is unique, that many countries are currently undergoing major programmes of legal reform, and that most development issues are country-specific, this study does not make any claim to comprehensiveness or coherency of treatment. If the book helps to accelerate reform efforts, i… More >>

EConomic Development, Foreign Investment and the Law

 

Your view on “Contrarian Investor Sees Economic Crash in China” (factual analysis appreciated)?

28 Apr

Following article extracted from NY Times, written by David Barboza, Friday, January 8, 2010,

James S. Chanos built one of the largest fortunes on Wall Street by foreseeing the collapse of Enron and other highflying companies whose stories were too good to be true.

Now Mr. Chanos, a wealthy hedge fund investor, is working to bust the myth of the biggest conglomerate of all: China Inc.

As most of the world bets on China to help lift the global economy out of recession, Mr. Chanos is warning that China’s hyperstimulated economy is headed for a crash, rather than the sustained boom that most economists predict. Its surging real estate sector, buoyed by a flood of speculative capital, looks like “Dubai times 1,000 — or worse,” he frets. He even suspects that Beijing is cooking its books, faking, among other things, its eye-popping growth rates of more than 8 percent.

“Bubbles are best identified by credit excesses, not valuation excesses,” he said in a recent appearance on CNBC. “And there’s no bigger credit excess than in China.” He is planning a speech later this month at the University of Oxford to drive home his point.

As America’s pre-eminent short-seller — he bets big money that companies’ strategies will fail — Mr. Chanos’s narrative runs counter to the prevailing wisdom on China. Most economists and governments expect Chinese growth momentum to continue this year, buoyed by what remains of a $586 billion government stimulus program that began last year, meant to lift exports and consumption among Chinese consumers.

Still, betting against China will not be easy. Because foreigners are restricted from investing in stocks listed inside China, Mr. Chanos has said he is searching for other ways to make his bets, including focusing on construction- and infrastructure-related companies that sell cement, coal, steel and iron ore.

Mr. Chanos, 51, whose hedge fund, Kynikos Associates, based in New York, has $6 billion under management, is hardly the only skeptic on China. But he is certainly the most prominent and vocal.

For all his record of prescience — in addition to predicting Enron’s demise, he also spotted the looming problems of Tyco International, the Boston Market restaurant chain and, more recently, home builders and some of the world’s biggest banks — his detractors say that he knows little or nothing about China or its economy and that his bearish calls should be ignored.

“I find it interesting that people who couldn’t spell China 10 years ago are now experts on China,” said Jim Rogers, who co-founded the Quantum Fund with George Soros and now lives in Singapore. “China is not in a bubble.”

Colleagues acknowledge that Mr. Chanos began studying China’s economy in earnest only last summer and sent out e-mail messages seeking expert opinion.

But he is tagging along with the bears, who see mounting evidence that China’s stimulus package and aggressive bank lending are creating artificial demand, raising the risk of a wave of nonperforming loans.

“In China, he seems to see the excesses, to the third and fourth power, that he’s been tilting against all these decades,” said Jim Grant, a longtime friend and the editor of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer, who is also bearish on China. “He homes in on the excesses of the markets and profits from them. That’s been his stock and trade.”

Mr. Chanos declined to be interviewed, citing his continuing research on China. But he has already been spreading the view that the China miracle is blinding investors to the risk that the country is producing far too much.

“The Chinese,” he warned in an interview in November with Politico.com, “are in danger of producing huge quantities of goods and products that they will be unable to sell.”

In December, he appeared on CNBC to discuss how he had already begun taking short positions, hoping to profit from a China collapse.

In recent months, a growing number of analysts, and some Chinese officials, have also warned that asset bubbles might emerge in China.

The nation’s huge stimulus program and record bank lending, estimated to have doubled last year from 2008, pumped billions of dollars into the economy, reigniting growth.

But many analysts now say that money, along with huge foreign inflows of “speculative capital,” has been funneled into the stock and real estate markets.

A result, they say, has been soaring prices and a resumption of the building boom that was under way in early 2008 — one that Mr. Chanos and others have called wasteful and overdone.

“It’s going to be a bust,” said Gordon G. Chang, whose book, “The Coming Collapse of China” (Random House), warned in 2001 of such a crash.

Friends and colleagues say Mr. Chanos is comfortable betting against the crowd — even if that crowd includes the likes of Warren E. Buffett and Wilbur L. Ross Jr., two other towering figures of the investment world.
Hi Cutie, good thoughts. Shouldnt all fortune tellers give a time frame of predictions ie telling that someone would become a billionaire in 2010 or in 20100?
Longlive, thanks for the valuable contribution, as always.
Mr Hex Vision, good points, cant agree with you more, adding to everything mentioned information and news are not so easily accessible by the locals which hindered local investors’ decisions wisely. Bottome line, when will the burst?

 
4 Comments

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Should we buy foreign currency in an economic crisis?

26 Apr

The American dollar is going downhill and there are rumors of a full collapse in 2009. Would it be wise to buy foreign currency? If so, which ones?

 

Isn’t a Balanced Budget the best possible economic stimulus?

23 Apr

During the Clinton/Gingrich years, the balanced budget led to the strongest ever US currency, that caused an explosion in the tech sector, investment oversears, a brain INFLUX from other countries and the strongest financial growth ever in the history of our country!
Then the first thing Bush did was write a huge tax break (taxes had already been hugely lowered under Clinton/Gingrich but not in an inflationary way!) and the market immediately tanked!
Foreign countries aren’t stupid – and they know when we can’t support our currency. As a result the value of our dollar has gone down BY MORE THAN HALF in the last 8 years!
That has stifled investment in our country, decreased our ability to import raw materials to do our own manufacturing, and resulted in the current credit crisis (OUR MONEY ISN’T WORTH ANYTHING SO WHY WOULD ANYONE ACCEPT IT AS COLLATERAL!)
The budget needs to be balanced and PRONTO!
That means returning taxes to some reasonable level for everyone – not only the rich – and lowering spending in a reasonable way (not shutting down the military and public schools as Ron Paul seems to think).
Your thoughts?
Let’s DEMAND that our politicians write a Balanced Budget Constitutional Amendment and then HOLD THEM TOO IT!
This thing about Social Security is interesting and I’d love to know the truth. It’s been accused against Clinton, but I remember hearing way before that that SS was being used to pay for other things.
I heard Clinton and Gingrich had figured it in to balance the budget – is this true?
If the budget was not balanced why did Republicans say it was at the time?